Using Reasonable Diligence, quotes image
The advice I initially received was proven wholly accurate as my case developed, and the  service given was honest, courteous, swift and professional. I have no hesitation in recommending this firm for its outstanding competence in its speciality.Please pass on my thanks to all others concerned at the firm,(including Emma Patterson who deftly handled my initial incredulity, anxiety and queries) and congratulations to you all for living up to your claims!"

David Cooke,  Solicitor, West Sussex."
Using Reasonable Diligence, image 1 Using Reasonable Diligence, image 2
This website is optimised to work with the most recent version of your browser software. make sure your browser is always updated to view the internet as it's supposed to be seen. Internet Explorer | Firefox

Using Reasonable Diligence

What is Reasonable Diligence ?

 

The offence of failing to provide driver information arrises when you are sent a request to  of a motor vehicle after an alleged road traffic offence has been committed.

 

If you are the registered keeper of a car and you are accused of failing to name the driver you will be found not guilty if you can show that you used reasonable diligence to ascertain who was driving at the time.

 

There is no statutory defintion of what amounts to reasonable diligence. Every case is decided on its own merits.

 

If you are going to try and use the defence of reasonable diligence you have to prove the defence on the balance of probabilities. This means that you have to show that "its more likely than not" that you have done your best to work out who was driving.

 

We have had cases where Judges have said that using reasonable diligence means "doing your best". Again each reasonable diligence argument is judged on its own facts.

 

Reasonable Diligence Checklist

  • If you don't know who was driving ask for photo evidence from the police. They don't always agree to send it out by explain you are struggling and use your powers of persuasion. Even if the photo is of the rear of the car its important to show that you asked!

 

  • Check that the other potential drivers were insured to drive the car - you don't want to get yourself into further trouble by being accused of permitting someone to drive your car without insurance (6 penalty points) !

 

  • Ask all possible drivers whether they could have been driving the car on that occassion before nominating them.

 

  • Check diary dates/work commitments to try and jog your memory

 

  • Look at a map and check the route if it was a long journey and you changed drivers on route.

 

  • Be careful about nominating people from abroad. The police rarely believe it and tend to think its just an attempt to avoid the points.

 

We are very good at defending allegations of failing to name the driver. We can often get the police to agree to take no further action or get the matter dropped without trial at court.

 

If you are struggling and you would like our expert help please Contact Us for further advice.

 

 

 

Ask a Free Question

If you have a court hearing date call 01626 359800

Latest News View all news

Page 1 of 11  > >>

Dec 23, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson
This case represents our toughest battle to date. It was a battle at every stage involving Magistrates, District Judges, Court Clerks, Cps lawyers and Crown Court Judges. The argument was all about whether a road was public or private.
Oct 26, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson
"I'm so proud of my team. They continue to go from strengh to strengh in terms of their skill and expertise in winning cases on behalf of out clients..." Emma Patterson, Principal Solicitor
Mar 10, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson

This article relates to a recent victory at court. The case does not set a precedent - but it shows that if handled with care it is possible to avoid points in a no insurance case where no one else was at fault.

Read on......