Totting up Penalty Points Ban, quotes image
“Bless you and your firm you are a credit to the industry and a blessing to those in distress - I can guarantee you I will refer anyone who is need of help in your firm’s direction.”
Totting up Penalty Points Ban, image 1 Totting up Penalty Points Ban, image 2
This website is optimised to work with the most recent version of your browser software. make sure your browser is always updated to view the internet as it's supposed to be seen. Internet Explorer | Firefox

Totting up Penalty Points Ban

Totting up Penalty Point Ban

A totting ban is when you are disqualified from driving under Section 35 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. In essence this section states that if a person accumulates 12 points on their licence and all the offences occur in three years of each other (the date on which you are convicted or sentenced is irrelevant) you are liable for disqualification for a minimum period of 6 months.

If you have had a previous totting ban within the 3 years proceeding the latest offence, then the minimum period is 12 months. If you have had 2 totting bans within the proceeding 3 years, then the minimum ban is 2 years.

The only way to avoid a totting ban is to either defend the allegation against you, argue Special Reasons and try to persuade the Court not to impose penalty points and/or make an Exceptional Hardship argument.

There is no set definition over what amounts to Exceptional Hardship. The only thing that the statute says is that the Magistrates can find that in the circumstances, it would cause exceptional hardship if they were to impose the ban and mitigate the normal sentence, i.e. the 6 month ban. If the Magistrates find Exceptional Hardship, then they can agree not to disqualify you at all or impose a reduced period of disqualification.

If you have made an Exceptional Hardship argument previously within the preceding 3 years, then you cannot use the same grounds again in relation to the current proceedings.

When you make an Exceptional Hardship argument, you have to give evidence on oath and support your argument with documentary evidence. The Court Clerk will record the grounds that you put forward and these will be entered on the Court Register. This is to stop you making an argument based on the same grounds within the following 3 years.

There is no set definition of what amounts to Exceptional Hardship but the Magistrates will normally consider the impact that any such disqualification will have on those who rely upon you. Therefore it will be that you deserve to be punished because you have accumulated 12 points within a 3 year period and that punishment inevitably involves hardship. However, they will be more willing to consider the impact that any such disqualification would have on those who rely upon you in light of the fact that those people have not committed any offences themselves.

We currently help over 84% of our clients avoid this type of ban and would be happy to assist. When individuals represent themselves they succeed only 39% of the time.

Be one of the 84% and keep your licence, Ask a FREE question TODAY!

 

Patterson Law.

Fighting your corner to keep you driving. Contact us for a free advice call.
Latest News View all news

We handle all our cases with the utmost care, but sometimes a client needs a greater degree of support and flexibility than would normally be required. This can be due to work commitments or only being available to give instructions at unsociable hours. It may also be down to the need to manage media coverage of their case or the potentialy devasting impact of a ban on their business/job.

In light of this we have decided to introduce "The Platinum Service".....

Notice of intended prosecution received more than 14 days after the alleged offence?

Read this before you reply .......

We have just won an important victory at Truro crown Court in relation to an allegation of speeding.

The Judge found that the speed trap at A30 Temple Junction - was potentially unreliable and the conviction in the Magistrates Court was unsafe....read more