Section 172 Failing to Provide Driver Identity | S. 172, quotes image
"Having googled for a solicitor who had expertise in the area of my alleged offence I found your firm and I have to say it I am so glad I contacted you. From the first phone call the attitude from your office was positive and informative. Once I instructed your firm officially I immediately felt that my case was at last being handled by someone who actually had an interest and knowledge and wanted to provide an exceptional service. All in all a positive experience. My thanks to all who had dealings with my case and especially to Louise Prout for the expediency with which she dealt with the case saving me many sleepless nights."
Section 172 Failing to Provide Driver Identity | S. 172, image 1 Section 172 Failing to Provide Driver Identity | S. 172, image 2
This website is optimised to work with the most recent version of your browser software. make sure your browser is always updated to view the internet as it's supposed to be seen. Internet Explorer | Firefox

Section 172 Failing to Provide Driver Identity | S. 172

Mar 9, 2010

Late notice of intended prosecution


Notice of intended prosecution received more than 14 days after the alleged offence?

Read this before you reply .......

Category: General
Posted by: patterson

The police have to make sure that the Notice of intended prosecution is served within 14 days of the date of the alleged offence.The police are not very adaptable and tend to miss the deadline if there is adverse weather or postal strikes. They always tend to send the NIP by first class post..

If you point out the delay they will often respond by saying that the NIP was sent out with suffiucient time for it to be delivered within the 14 days allowed. This is old law. There is a rebutable preseumption of service if it is sent with sufficient time for it to be deliever but you only have to cast a doubt that it was delievered within the days days to win the argument.

There are exceptions to the rule if you have moved recently and not updated your address at the DVLA or if you have only just bought the car, so don't be too quick to reach the conclusiuon that you have a defence.

If the police have no excuse for the late NIP you may have a defence to the speeding allegation and we can help you.

You still have to name the driver but you can then reject the ticket on the basis that the police have failed to comply with s.1 RTOA 1988.

Email us for expert advice on your case before doing this!

At this stage we might be able to persuade the police to take no further action.

 

 

 

Patterson Law.

Fighting your corner to keep you driving. Contact us for a free advice call.
Latest News View all news

Page 1 of 7  > >>

Jul 26, 2010
Category: General
Posted by: patterson

Its a reliable indication of how good you are as a defence lawyer when the Police Federation ask you for advice !

"Thank you for all your help. After our conversation I wrote out a plan, for the officer, for court. He printed it off and used it when addressing the bench. This included the legal points, his position and that of CPS.  In short it worked and he was found not guilty."

John Grant

Chairman - Thames Valley Police Federation

Jul 13, 2010
Category: General
Posted by: patterson
James Tucker,  Head of Teucro Chambers,  praises the expertise of Patterson Law...read on...
Jul 6, 2010
Category: General
Posted by: patterson

 

Instructed 4pm yesterday! Succesfully won trial today at 2pm....!

Patterson Law Lawyer Ria Pleass strikes again on behalf of motorist at risk of a ban...read on..