No Insurance | Permitting No Insurance | Caught Driving Without Insurance , quotes image
"Dear Emma, I received a summons for driving without a licence, no insurance and speeding. I looked at your website and contacted you. What a choice I made. Ria Please took on my complicated case, as I had confusion with the DVLA. I write this to tell you how Ria handled my case, she was different class throughout the two month period. What a professional and friendly lady a credit to herself and your company. She kept me informed throughout and always called me when she said she would (not many people do that nowadays). Through her knowledge and professionalism she got the insurance and licence dropped, I always admitted speeding. She then went on to only get me a fixed penalty for speeding.... I'd recommend her and your company to anyone. Thank you and her for all your help. Please pass on my kind regards and thanks to Ria."
No Insurance | Permitting No Insurance | Caught Driving Without Insurance , image 1 No Insurance | Permitting No Insurance | Caught Driving Without Insurance , image 2
This website is optimised to work with the most recent version of your browser software. make sure your browser is always updated to view the internet as it's supposed to be seen. Internet Explorer | Firefox

No Insurance | Permitting No Insurance | Caught Driving Without Insurance

Mar 9, 2010

Late notice of intended prosecution


Notice of intended prosecution received more than 14 days after the alleged offence?

Read this before you reply .......

Category: General
Posted by: patterson

The police have to make sure that the Notice of intended prosecution is served within 14 days of the date of the alleged offence.The police are not very adaptable and tend to miss the deadline if there is adverse weather or postal strikes. They always tend to send the NIP by first class post..

If you point out the delay they will often respond by saying that the NIP was sent out with suffiucient time for it to be delivered within the 14 days allowed. This is old law. There is a rebutable preseumption of service if it is sent with sufficient time for it to be deliever but you only have to cast a doubt that it was delievered within the days days to win the argument.

There are exceptions to the rule if you have moved recently and not updated your address at the DVLA or if you have only just bought the car, so don't be too quick to reach the conclusiuon that you have a defence.

If the police have no excuse for the late NIP you may have a defence to the speeding allegation and we can help you.

You still have to name the driver but you can then reject the ticket on the basis that the police have failed to comply with s.1 RTOA 1988.

Email us for expert advice on your case before doing this!

At this stage we might be able to persuade the police to take no further action.

 

 

 

Ask a Free Question

If you have a court hearing date call 01626 359800

Latest News View all news

Page 1 of 11  > >>

Dec 23, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson
This case represents our toughest battle to date. It was a battle at every stage involving Magistrates, District Judges, Court Clerks, Cps lawyers and Crown Court Judges. The argument was all about whether a road was public or private.
Oct 26, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson
"I'm so proud of my team. They continue to go from strengh to strengh in terms of their skill and expertise in winning cases on behalf of out clients..." Emma Patterson, Principal Solicitor
Mar 10, 2011
Category: General
Posted by: patterson

This article relates to a recent victory at court. The case does not set a precedent - but it shows that if handled with care it is possible to avoid points in a no insurance case where no one else was at fault.

Read on......